Following on from the discussion around yesterday's post, and the very helpful feedback people here and on Google+ gave, I've been playing around with possible page layouts again.
Here's what I've come up with. An A5 single-column layout, but with a kind of side-bar sort of thing. I like it a lot.
Any further thoughts or feedback?
I really like this. This is how you should proceed, in my opinion. Nice work, Gavin.
ReplyDeleteThings I especially like here:
ReplyDelete-Souvenir font (classic)
-floofy embellishment around page number
-overall layout is easy to read and perhaps more space-efficient than a double column
Glad you like it guys!
ReplyDeleteGorgonmilk... it's all about the floof!
I think that side-bar will also come in very handy for my astute and erudite "author's notes" ;)
I like this also. I've considered it before, but I mostly work with d20-era stuff and the spell summaries are too long for it to be generally practical.
ReplyDeleteThat is indeed awesome.
ReplyDeleteLooks good to me, too.
ReplyDeleteDayum.
ReplyDeleteMakes me wish I hadn't released Magical Theorems & Dark Pacts yet.
That said, I prefer to have spells in alphabetical order instead of sorted by class / level - makes them a LOT easier to find when referencing powers of creatures and magic items.
(which just requires adding a "Level" notation to the sidebar where I would place the class and level note)
Delete"That said, I prefer to have spells in alphabetical order instead of sorted by class / level - makes them a LOT easier to find when referencing powers of creatures and magic items."
DeleteThat's a good point. I guess though in a book like I'm writing now, which is mostly new spells, there's not gonna be any monsters or magic items referencing any of them, so it's kind of a moot point in this case.
"(which just requires adding a "Level" notation to the sidebar where I would place the class and level note)"
Yeah I'd also thought that it could easily fit a level/class descriptor as well, if need be.